Bug 35872
Summary: | libbfd compatibility problems? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Thierry Valentin <valentin> |
Component: | binutils | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-04-13 15:51:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Thierry Valentin
2001-04-13 15:51:50 UTC
libbfd is never meant to be compatible, it is a shared library only so that all of gas/ld/nm/strip/... can share it. The API is changing all the time. If you want to ship a program using libbfd, basically the only option unless you want to run it yourself only is to link libbfd.a in instead of linking with -lbfd, that way the program will run everywhere. Otherwise, even in the same distribution if somebody updates binutils the program will suddenly not work (or rpm dependencies will fail). I linked my program with libbfd.a and this fixes my problem. Thanks a lot for your help. |