Bug 364901
Summary: | anaconda fails to see dmraid on ICH9DO, accessing drives directly | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | James Twyford <jtwyford+rhbz> | ||||||||
Component: | dmraid | Assignee: | Heinz Mauelshagen <heinzm> | ||||||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||||
Version: | 8 | CC: | agk, bmr, dimi, dwysocha, haebler, heinzm, mauelshagen-do-not-use, mbroz, prockai | ||||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-10 18:22:51 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
James Twyford
2007-11-03 00:31:31 UTC
Restarted the installer so I could get more data posted. Switching VTerms to list relevant console output after the first error: I've got the system in front of me and stable, there's no data on it whatsoever so I can screw around as much as necessary to help get this fixed. ==VT1== Starting graphical installation... isw: untested metadata version 1.2.04 found on /dev/sdf isw: untested metadata version 1.2.04 found on /dev/sde isw: untested metadata version 1.2.04 found on /dev/sdd isw: untested metadata version 1.2.04 found on /dev/sdc isw: untested metadata version 1.2.04 found on /dev/sdb Error Error opening /dev/mapper/isw_bihbjjgche_Volume0: No such device or address 80 ==VT3== 09:06:30 WARNING : /usr/lib/anaconda/dmraid.py:247: UserWarning: device node created in /tmp isys.makeDevInode(d, dp) 09:06:30 WARNING : /usr/lib/anaconda/dmraid.py:129: UserWarning: device node created in /tmp isys.makdeDevInode(d, dp) 09:06:31 ERROR : Activating raid isw_bihbjjgche_Volume0 failed: 09:06:31 ERROR : table: 0 3907073024 raid45 core 2 131072 nosync raid5_la 1 28 5 -1 /dev/sdb 0 /dev/sdc 0 /dev/sdd 0 /dev/sde 0 /dev/sdf 0 09:06:31 ERROR : exception: device-mapper: reload ioctl failed: Invalid argument 09:06:31 CRITICAL: parted exception: Error: Error opening /dev/mapper/isw_bihbjjgche_Volume0: No such device or address ==VT4== -cut off, can't scroll up- <4>raid6: sse1x2 2703 MB/s <4>raid6: sse2x1 3753 MB/s <4>raid6: sse2x2 4285 MB/s <4>raid6: using algorithm sse2x2 (4285 MB/s) <6>md: raid6 personality registered for level 6 <6>md: raid5 personality registered for level 5 <6>md: raid4 personality registered for level 4 <6>md: raid10 personality registered for level 10 <4>GFS2 (built Oct 30 2007 13:08:29) installed <6>Lock_Nolock (built Oct 30 2007 13:08:47) installed <6>JFS: nTxBlock = 8192, nTxLock = 65536 <6>SGI XFS with ACLs, security attributes, large block numbers, no debug enabled <6>SGI XFS Quota Management subsystem <6>device-mapper: ioctl: 4.11.0 ioctl (2006-10-12) initialised: dm-devel <6>device-mapper: multipath: version 1.0.5 loaded <6>device-mapper: multipath round-robin: version 1.0.0 loaded <6>device-mapper: multipath emc: version 0.0.3 loaded <6>usbcore: registered new interface driver appletouch <5>audit(1193994357.517:3) audit_pid=915 old=0 by auid=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:anaconda_t:s0 <6>ACPI: PCI Interrupt: 0000:01:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 <3>device-mapper: table: 253:0: raid45: unknown target type <4>device-mapper: ioctl: error adding target to table I am seeing the same thing with CentOS 5.2 on an Asus P5Q PRO with ICH10R, so presumably the same problem exists with RHEL 5.2. I note that the documentation for dmraid only mentions RAID 0 and 1 for Intel Software RAID. I'm going to give Fedora 9 a whizz too in case it's the kernel support which is behind, since it looks to me like the the main problem is that "device-mapper: raid45: unknown target type" error. Really I want to try Citrix XenServer on this box but it barfs at the P5Q's unsupported GbE LAN interface (Attansic L1, pci id 1969:1026), so was hoping a more recent CentOS/RHEL would do the trick (since Citrix XenServer is based on CentOS), and I could add the net driver after installation. Created attachment 319468 [details]
Bad detect raid whith Ich9
At installation Fedora 10 Beta I think it the same problem, no answer from anaconda after step choose lang, if I want to install, i have to do unplug (sata cable ) the media sdc
I join too /tmp/syslog and /tmp/X.log
Created attachment 319469 [details]
Bad detect raid whith Ich9
At installation Fedora 10 Beta I think it the same problem, no answer from anaconda after step choose lang, if I want to install, i have to do unplug (sata cable ) the media sdc
I join too /tmp/anaconda.log and /tmp/X.log
Created attachment 319470 [details]
Bad detect raid whith Ich9
At installation Fedora 10 Beta I think it the same problem, no answer from anaconda after step choose lang, if I want to install, i have to do unplug (sata cable ) the media sdc
I join too /tmp/anaconda.log and /tmp/syslog
This message is a reminder that Fedora 8 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 8. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '8'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 8's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 8 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Same problem here with Intel ICH8R RAID using Fedora 10 Final. Anaconda sees the drives independently, and complains that I have two drives labeled identically (with '/boot') and just exists. This is fixed in newer Fedora versions. |