Bug 365141
Summary: | Review Request: iotop - Top like utility for I/O | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, jeder, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | ivazqueznet:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-11-03 17:57:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Adel Gadllah
2007-11-03 11:57:29 UTC
iotop-20070930-1.fc7.noarch.rpm: iotop.noarch: W: no-documentation iotop-20070930-1.fc7.src.rpm: Use "install -p -m 0755" instead of cp and chmod. Fixed version (version is 0.1) Fixed %install New package: http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/iotop.spec http://tgmweb.at/gadllah/iotop-0.1-1.fc7.src.rpm Approved. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iotop Short Description: Top like utility for I/O Owners: drago01 Branches: F-7 F-8 Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: iotop New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: drago01 iotop requires python 2.5, which neither EL4 nor EL5 have. Did you find some way to port it back to previous python versions? Kevin, No I did not. Just cancel this request. Thanks (In reply to comment #7) > iotop requires python 2.5, which neither EL4 nor EL5 have. > Did you find some way to port it back to previous python versions? The python version issue might be fixable, but the kernel support is missing in RHEL4/5 too.. So no this package is not suitable for EPEL until RHEL6 is released. |