Bug 367481

Summary:	Time zone labeling is amazingly missleading and incomplete.
Product:	Red Hat Satellite 5	Reporter:	Justin Sherrill <jsherril>
Component:	WebUI	Assignee:	Justin Sherrill <jsherril>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	510	CC:	cperry
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2014-05-09 10:21:27 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	448042, 471260

Description Justin Sherrill 2007-11-05 21:09:39 UTC

Currently we list time zones in an odd way.  We have a list like this:

(GMT-0500) United States (Eastern)


Which doesn't make sense because GMT does not follow daylight savings time.  So
if you select "(GMT-0500) United States (Eastern)" you would actually get GMT -
5 hours for half the year and GMT - 4 hours for the other half.  The labeling is
just wrong as the actual time zone used by the app is "America/New York" and not
an offset of GMT.

In addition many parts of the world are not even covered by this, we only
include around 25 "time zones" but when you take into account all the
differences in locales there are many more.  



It wouldn't be hard to implement a change as we would just list the locale
instead of a false GMT offset and we would add all the available locales, not
just a static set.

Comment 1 Justin Sherrill 2007-11-05 21:15:53 UTC

Filing as an exception for 5.1 for approval

Comment 6 Clifford Perry 2014-05-09 10:21:27 UTC

We have not addressed this specific bug for over 4 years. This bug was reported as either Satellite 5.0 or 5.1, both of which have now End of Life and not supported. I am closing out as wontfix to clear from backlog. 

Please re-open if you disagree and wish further review.

Cliff