Bug 370831

Summary: anaconda installed gcc - but not glibc-headers
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Satish Balay <balay>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: david
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-08-26 19:45:25 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
anaconda-ks.cfg
none
install.log
none
anaconda.log none

Description Satish Balay 2007-11-08 05:41:46 UTC 
Description of problem:

gcc rpm spec file should have 'requires: glibc-headers'

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

gcc-4.1.2-33
glibc-headers-2.7-2

How reproducible:

I did a 'custom' package selection during Fedora8 install. I ended
with a broken gcc [ with "missing stdio.h" errors]

I had to do a subsequent 'yum install glibc-headers to fix this problem.
Comment 1 Satish Balay 2007-11-08 05:41:46 UTC 
Created attachment 251231 [details]
anaconda-ks.cfg
Comment 2 Satish Balay 2007-11-08 05:43:14 UTC 
Created attachment 251241 [details]
install.log
Comment 3 Satish Balay 2007-11-08 05:47:11 UTC 
>>>> gcc rpm spec file should have 'requires: glibc-headers'

Ops - please ignore this initial problem statement.

I started off assuming that this is a problem with gcc specfile - but later
realized that its anaconda issue - so modified the bugreport [but didnt' modify
this text properly]
Comment 4 Jeremy Katz 2007-11-09 14:29:06 UTC 
Can you attach /var/log/anaconda* as well?
Comment 5 Satish Balay 2007-11-09 17:53:18 UTC 
Created attachment 253111 [details]
anaconda.log
Comment 6 Chris Lumens 2008-08-26 17:18:36 UTC 
Hm, I haven't heard any other reports of this problem, and your log files don't indicate anything obviously wrong (besides, of course, glibc-headers missing from the install.log).  Is this repeatable with an install of F10 Alpha?  I don't really know what else to ask for that could help get to the bottom of this problem.  I don't think we turned up a similar problem to this in testing.
Comment 7 Satish Balay 2008-08-26 19:38:54 UTC 
I don't remember all the custom choices I chose during the install of FC8 - so this experiment is not really reproducable.

I was hoping the logfiles had sufficient info to track this. Since then - I have
FC9 installed on a newer machine [perhaps without much custom tweaking] - and this install didn't have this problem.

If its not traceable - then closing this issue is fine by me.

thanks,
Satish