Bug 372401
Summary: | Pirut does not sort its search results | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Julian Sikorski <belegdol> |
Component: | pirut | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | ch.nolte, james.antill, mszpak |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-28 19:15:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Julian Sikorski
2007-11-09 09:52:31 UTC
The results are ordered by relevance rather than alphabetically now just like the output of yum search I preferred the old behaviour. Can we have an option to switch between two? Adding options isn't the answer. Insert obligatory link to Havoc's long ago blog post here :-) Right now, leaving open so that I can think on it rather than doing kneejerk reaction changes. (In reply to comment #1) > The results are ordered by relevance rather than alphabetically now just like > the output of yum search It's certainly good to know there was a method to pirut's madness. :) With the ordering by relevence, I usually find myself reading through the entire list of packages, because I see multiple versions of packages. For someone who didn't know how pirut was deciding to sort packages, it meant that if I found a package that looked like it might be what I need, I wasn't confident that it was the most up to date package in the repository until I went ahead and finished looking at the list to make sure there weren't any newer packages. This might be unnecessary effort if pirut is sorting newer versions towards the top of the list, but on the surface I couldn't tell if it was sorting things at all. Sorting by name wouldn't give as intelligent results as relevence, but I'd personally find it more comfortable to use because the rules behind the sorting are more obvious. This isn't going to get changed at this point as pirut is pretty much entirely EOL'd and only getting critical fixes for older releases. In Fedora 9 and later, any such concerns can be filed against PackageKit/gnome-packagekit. |