Bug 379451
Summary: | Cifs unmount on shutdown takes more than a minute | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrick Steiner <patrick> |
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Jeff Layton <jlayton> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | steved |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-11-28 14:02:39 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Patrick Steiner
2007-11-13 07:02:32 UTC
This seem to be a cifs.ko issue, re-assigning to Jeff. What sort of server is this? the clients are: redhat es 3 incl. latest updates redhat es 4 incl. latest updates fedora 8 incl. latest updates the server is a netapp fas2050 here is the mount entry from fstab: //foo/INSTALL /mnt/net/foo/install cifs auto,credentials=/root/.smbcredentials,uid=500,gid=500 1 1 mount outputs: //foo/INSTALL on /mnt/net/foo/install type cifs (rw,mand) I suspect that this is a duplicate of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191112 ...you might want to try looking at captures with wireshark and see if the server is sending a bogus BCC value in the LogoffANDX response. I'm going to close this as a duplicate of that bug and suggest opening a case with netapp. They may already have a filer patch that fixes this (I'm not sure). Note that a patch recently went upstream to fix a potential buffer overflow in CIFS. That patch has the side effect of making the client not expect a response from the server for Logoff requests. That may also work around this problem, but it's not in Fedora yet. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 191112 *** |