Bug 38431

Summary: pdftex included in tetex is outdated
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Reporter: clepple
Component: tetexAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 7.1CC: rdieter
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2001-05-11 14:15:04 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description clepple 2001-04-30 18:21:29 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0) <-- OK, 
you caught me :-)


The version of pdftex in the tetex package (the one included with RH 6.2, 
7.0 and 7.1) is 0.13d, which is getting outdated. The current version is 
somewhere around 0.14h, I think.

Including a new version would help reduce the number of FAQs on the pdftex 
lists (the answers to which usually end in "...upgrade to the latest 
version").

Since pdftex development moves much faster than plain TeX or LaTeX, it may 
be a good idea to split pdftex and pdflatex into a separate RPM (though I 
don't know much about the tetex distribution itself -- this may be asking 
for trouble if the rest of tetex gets upgraded).

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. pdftex -v => pdfTeX (Web2C 7.3.1) 3.14159-0.13d [...]	

A good point of reference for pdfTeX is 
http://www.tug.org/applications/pdftex/ - an archive of the mailing list 
is there, and in the archive there are several explanations of how to 
install new versions.

The other option might be to switch to MiKTeX.

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2001-05-11 14:14:59 UTC
FYI, Switching to MikTeX is not an option as it is a Windows-only TeX
distribution.  )-:

Otherwise, either manually patch in the new pdftex into tetex or lobby tetex to
do it for us.


Comment 2 Tim Waugh 2001-06-04 22:26:07 UTC
I would rather have the upstream teTeX maintainer integrate it I think.

Presumably tetex-beta has a recent pdftex..