Bug 385071
Summary: | Unresolved dependency for elfutils-libelf-devel-0.131-1.i386 on x86_64 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Philip Spencer <pspencer> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6 | CC: | dcantrell, katzj, lmacken, roland, rvokal, triage |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | bzcl34nup | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-06 19:48:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Philip Spencer
2007-11-15 17:33:43 UTC
[Sorry, forgot to add that elfutils-devel is in the same situation as elfutils-libelf-devel, requiring elfutils-devel-static.i386] This seems to be a bug in the updates system or something like that. The rpms were all built, but some were omitted from the push for biarch. The -static.x86_64 rpms are present in the x86_64 dir, and the -static.i386 rpms are present in the i386 dir, but -static.i386 are missing from x86_64, which does have -devel.i386. Note that in F7 and later, elfutils-devel no longer requires elfutils-devel-static and elfutils-libelf-devel no longer requires elfutils-libelf-devel-static. I added elfutils-devel-static and elfutils-libelf-devel-static to the FC-6 biarch list and requested a repush for elfutils-0.131-1.fc6. Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks. If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6, please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting the change. Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we are following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |