Bug 393341
| Summary: | why wxWidgets 2.4 compatibility is enabled? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nerijus Baliūnas <nerijus> |
| Component: | wxGTK | Assignee: | Matthew Miller <mattdm> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 8 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-07-31 14:18:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Nerijus Baliūnas
2007-11-20 22:30:30 UTC
Is there a downside of enabling it? I can turn it off, but it seemed good to have. wx by default enables compatibility with one past version only (2.6 in this case), and imho it's enough. When applications are ported to a higher wx version, they usually are made to work with wx compiled with default settings (by just running ./configure), so enabling more compatibility is useless and only makes library bigger (unless there are apps which do not work without --enable-compat24, but I don't know any). Anyway, it's a minor issue. I think retaining compatibility for two versions is valuable enough that I'm inclined to keep it on. How much space/memory is saved by not enabling it? |