Bug 393671
Summary: | Could patch from SynCE team be picked up into kernel? | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexey Neyman <alex.neyman> | ||||
Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Kernel Maintainer List <kernel-maint> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 8 | CC: | chris.brown, jonstanley | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | i686 | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-02-13 23:32:58 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Alexey Neyman
2007-11-21 06:01:45 UTC
Created attachment 265701 [details]
Patch updated to 2.6.23 kernel
Unless this patch is reviewed and accepted by the upstream maintainers we can't put it in Fedora since it might break something. As far as I understand, not all the patches applied to Fedora kernels are upstream-approved. In this case, would it be possible to include such a patch if I reworked it so that the current behavior is default and the behavior introduced by SynCE patch is enabled by some module parameter? This way it could be configurable in /etc/modprobe.conf. Why not just submit it upstream for comments first? If it's needed for this device to work, then it should be upstream so everyone gets it. You must be mistaken: I am not SynCE maintainer; I am just a Fedora user and an owner of a WM6 device that triggers this bug when plugged in. I am not knowledgeable enough even to describe what the patch does. For me, the patch from SynCE site just fixes the problem - that's why I asked if Fedora kernel maintainers could pick it up. Otherwise, I'll have to stick to creating custom kernels for the F8 lifetime every time I update the packages. Does this patch from 2.6.24 work? http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=500d2c2f7b8c1cf6194dc9e8f47c6e2295fc5be5 Alexey - Have you had a chance to try the 2.6.24 patch posted in comment #6? Closing as no comment in over two months now... Alexey - please re-open if this is still an issue in 2.6.24. |