Bug 393761
Summary: | [RHEL5.2] evolution-exchange-storage has a memory leak | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Peter Wainwright <peter.wainwright> |
Component: | evolution-connector | Assignee: | Milan Crha <mcrha> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | desktop-bugs <desktop-bugs> |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 5.1 | CC: | mbarnes, syeghiay |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-09-02 09:16:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 460669 |
Description
Peter Wainwright
2007-11-21 08:42:44 UTC
Evolution will be rebased to version 2.12 in the next RHEL5 update, so it sounds like this problem is already taken care of. Actually no, I found a rather severe memory leak in evolution-exchange-storage that occurs everytime Evolution scans the Exchange folder tree. See: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523023 This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1261.html |