Bug 403991
Summary: | Review Request: mythes-cs - Czech thesaurus | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Caolan McNamara <caolanm> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Parag AN(पराग) <panemade> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | panemade:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-11-30 07:58:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Caolan McNamara
2007-11-29 08:08:41 UTC
Do you think adding my is ok as I see most of thesaurus packages you submitted have common upstream tarball as thes-<LANGCODE> So just a suggestion is it ok that you use srpm name as "thes-cs"? oops wrong mouse movement granted review I preferred mythes-foo because the thesaurus software that reads them is called "mythes" and these thesauri are specifically in that "mythes" format i.e. that of "OpenOffice.org MyThes" http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Dictionaries I considered packaging the mythes library itself separately to make that explicit point, but it's a tiny messy static library in it's standalone form so it's more trouble than its worth to package in that state. Packaging looks Ok to me. rpmlint is silent. APPROVED. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mythes-cs Short Description: Czech Thesaurus Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. built |