Bug 40530
Summary: | 5 and 10-packs are upfront billing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Web Site | Reporter: | Jay Turner <jturner> |
Component: | New Store | Assignee: | Cameron Prince <cprince> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | wbirkhea |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | current | CC: | srevivo |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2001-05-17 18:25:17 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jay Turner
2001-05-14 12:00:38 UTC
Shouldn't we also let the customer know that all money is paid up front for those products? I mean if I were to place that in my cart, and I saw that it's price was $59.95, and all of a sudden I am getting charged $719.40. I guess what I am trying to say here is that we need to let them know before the receipt page. That's exactly what this bug says. The expected result is that $719.40 gets added to the cart. The message about the receipt needing a content change is listed as an afterthought. Just for a paper trail, I have looked into this, and will perhaps require a couple of columns added to the rh_product table (or another one). We will need to know the following 1) Is this an "upfront" payment type? 2) How frequently the payments would have been made? (daily, monthly, yearly) With that, we could then calculate how much the customer needs to be charged. Again, these are just notes, and comments are welcome :) Actually, I think that this has become more complicated after a discussion with Rich Crandall. According to him, the $59.95 and $99.00 prices are actually per server for the year. So, the way that this is being handled in the internal store currently is that the reps are putting quantity 5 of the 5-packs (for the 5 machines) The reason for this is so that the contracts get created correctly on the backside. So, don't know the best way to deal with this, as I don't think that we can tell IC to translate that 1 5-pack is really 5 of that item number. |