Bug 406241

Summary:	3.14: OnHoldState and InProgressState for bug status.
Product:	[Community] Bugzilla	Reporter:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Component:	Bugzilla General	Assignee:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	3.2	CC:	bkahn, cward
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	2 hours
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-04-23 21:24:46 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description David Lawrence 2007-11-30 16:58:21 UTC

Description:
Red Hat subroutines for returning a list of bug statuses that are considered either HOLD states or INPROGRESS states.

Function Requirements:
globals.pl

Comment 1 David Lawrence 2007-12-20 05:23:53 UTC

LOC Estimation:

globals.pl: 14
showdependencytree.cgi: 2
test cases needed to test 2 functions * 20 lines average code: 40
time to write selenium tests needed for showdependencytree.cgi: 2 hours
templates: 6

Total LOC: 62

Comment 2 Kevin Baker 2008-04-15 01:52:21 UTC

Ben,

can you remind us if this is still necessary for the final release.

Comment 3 Benjamin Kahn 2008-04-15 03:33:46 UTC

This is for colorization of the dependency tree, right?

It can probably wait, I don't use this anymore since we don't tend to use
tracker bugs.  But others might be relying on it now.

Comment 4 David Lawrence 2008-04-15 03:39:53 UTC

(In reply to comment #3)
> This is for colorization of the dependency tree, right?
> 

Yes.

> It can probably wait, I don't use this anymore since we don't tend to use
> tracker bugs.  But others might be relying on it now.

Ok, i vote we remove it as a blocker for now and see if anyone speaks up.

Dave

Comment 5 Chris Ward 2009-04-02 05:59:57 UTC

Can I vote -? :-) What was the original use case here? Isn't this obtainable with simple boolean queries?

Comment 6 David Lawrence 2009-04-23 21:24:46 UTC

(In reply to comment #5)
> Can I vote -? :-) What was the original use case here? Isn't this obtainable
> with simple boolean queries?  

Yeah this was a cosmetic change to the dependency tree to show at a glance using color which bugs were in which stage of work. As Ben stated noone is really using this anymore and we haven't had it since 3.2 rolled out without complaint.

So will close this.

Dave