Bug 422691
Summary: | GKrellM for EPEL 4 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
Component: | gkrellm | Assignee: | Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | el4 | CC: | hdegoede |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-02-10 00:37:20 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 420431 |
Description
Robert Scheck
2007-12-12 23:19:35 UTC
Oh yes, a dumb rebuild brings this: No Package Found for libSM-devel 0:gtk2-devel-2.4.13-22.i386 0:gettext-0.14.1-13.i386 0:lm_sensors-devel-2.8.7-2.40.3.i386 0:gnutls-devel-1.0.20-3.2.3.i386 0:desktop-file-utils-0.9-3.el4.i386 But shouldn't requiring xorg-devel or similar solve this? (In reply to comment #0) > There is no GKrellM for EPEL 4 - what is preventing us to do so? (In reply to comment #1) > Oh yes, a dumb rebuild brings this: Yeah, that, and ... a maintainer :) While I do maintain gkrellm for EPEL 5 at the moment, I have no plans to do it for EPEL 4. Actually, due to various things I no longer have any EPEL 5 GUI boxes around either so a new EPEL 5 maintainer for gkrellm would be welcome too. More info at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/VilleSkytt%C3%A4#maintenance I've no longer EPEL 4 with GNOME around. |