Bug 425885

Summary: autofs fails if LDAP attribute value is the same as a standard autofs attribute name
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Ian Kent <ikent>
Component: autofs5Assignee: Ian Kent <ikent>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 4.6CC: ikent, jmoyer
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: Regression
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0659 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-07-24 19:08:55 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 333771    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2007-12-17 06:25:12 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2007-12-17 06:26:17 UTC
This bugzilla has Keywords: Regression.  

Since no regressions are allowed between releases, 
it is also being proposed as a blocker for this release.  

Please resolve ASAP.

Comment 3 Barry Donahue 2008-02-18 20:47:20 UTC
Testing covered by automated regression test.

Comment 4 Ian Kent 2008-03-12 03:57:26 UTC
Test is identified in the comments above and repeated in this comment.

The RHTS sub test bz333771 under autofs-tests/bugzillas can
be used to verify this bug.

This issue is fixed in autofs5-5.0.1-0.rc2.87.

Comment 6 Barry Donahue 2008-06-12 13:40:44 UTC
Verified RHTS job #23575

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2008-07-24 19:08:55 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0659.html