Bug 426078

Summary:	Xerox Phaser 3117 is not correctly configured
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Ozan Çağlayan <ozan.caglayan>
Component:	system-config-printer	Assignee:	Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-01-17 09:45:24 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ozan Çağlayan 2007-12-18 09:04:14 UTC

Description of problem:

I plugged in a Xerox Phaser 3117 printer. Here's the detection process logged by
syslog:
Dec 18 09:58:45 localhost hal_lpadmin: Device ID: MFG:Xerox;MDL:Phaser
3117;DES:;CMD:GDI; URI:usb://Xerox/Phaser%203117

Dec 18 09:58:46 localhost hal_lpadmin: PPD:
foomatic-db-ppds/Lanier/PS/Lanier-LP025_LP026_PS.ppd.gz; Status: 3

system-config-printer choosed Lanier-LP025 driver with a recognition status
3(NO_DRIVER).

If the ppd for Samsung ML-6040 is used instead of this Lanier, the printer works
perfectly. Here's the related openprinting.org entry:
http://openprinting.org/show_printer.cgi?recnum=Xerox-Phaser_3117

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-printer 0.7.78
hal-cups-utils 0.6.13 (svn86)

Comment 1 Tim Waugh 2008-01-16 16:52:50 UTC

Changing component to rawhide.

Um, it looks like you are not using our RPMs at all.  What does this say?:

rpm -q cups
rpm -V cups

Most likely you do not have a 'textonly.ppd' available, nor a 'postscript.ppd'.
 There really isn't anything sensible we can do in that case.

Comment 2 Ozan Çağlayan 2008-01-16 20:06:03 UTC

Actually, I'm integrating the automatic printer detection process that you
developed into a Turkish Linux distribution called Pardus[0]. I'm gonna check if
I'm missing those ppd's.

Thanks for your reply.

[0] : http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng

Comment 3 Tim Waugh 2008-01-17 09:45:24 UTC

OK.  Closing as this is not a Fedora bug (please ask future integration
questions in private mail instead).