Bug 426228
Summary: | Review Request: perl-Class-Inner - A perlish implementation of Java like inner classes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Xavier Bachelot <xavier> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2007-12-21 12:42:57 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 426230 |
Description
Xavier Bachelot
2007-12-19 13:18:35 UTC
rpmlint gives a clean output. This failed to build for me due to a missing build dependency on Test::More: t/basic....Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ... Adding that gets things to build. (In reply to comment #2) > This failed to build for me due to a missing build dependency on Test::More: > > t/basic....Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: ... > > Adding that gets things to build. > Yup, seen that at home yesterday night. The strange thing is it did build properly on my mock setup. Fixed in http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Test-Unit-0.25-2.fc8.src.rpm oops, bad link. The good one is http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Class-Inner-0.1-2.fc8.src.rpm Source URL should probably be http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Inner/. There's usually no reason to put the class name in the summary, since it's derivable from the package name, but this isn't really a big deal. I don't see how you came to "GPLv2+ or Artistic 2.0" for the license tag. All I can see is that the README says "same as Perl", which is GPL+ or Artistic. This package puts a file in %{perl_vendorlib}/Class but doesn't own it or depend on anything that owns it. * source files match upstream: b4dcb388ac32923adbb9d2a501216a4fe039de4d6a447cc163c110826df81467 Class-Inner-0.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. X license field does not match the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Class::Inner) = 0.1 perl-Class-Inner = 0.1-2.fc9 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.01 CPU) X owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. http://washington.kelkoo.net/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Class-Inner-0.1-3.fc8.src.rpm Summary, License and URL fixed. Directory ownership fixed. Awesome; looks great. APPROVED Thanks for the quick review tibbs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Inner Short Description: A perlish implementation of Java like inner classes Owners: xavierb Branches: F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. Thanks Kevin. Package imported and built for devel and F-8. |