Bug 427078
| Summary: | Review Request: nexcontrol - Software to control your Celestron NexStar Telescope | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marek Mahut <mmahut> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Parag AN(पराग) <panemade> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | panemade:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-12-31 22:54:05 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Marek Mahut
2007-12-30 23:26:33 UTC
I think license here is GPLv2 not GPLv2+ + rpmlint is silent. + License is open source compatible. - But as license text is not included in source file nexcontrol.pl, license is GPLv2. + spec is clean. + source verified with upstream source URL 7eba08240de22d2baf794b00d9731440 nexcontrol.tar.gz APPROVED. SHOULD: License tag is GPLv2 Thank you for this review, are you sure it's GPLv2? [mmahut@mmahut nexcontrol-0.2]$ grep -c "any later version" LICENSE 2 [mmahut@mmahut nexcontrol-0.2]$ New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nexcontrol Short Description: Software to control your Celestron NexStar Telescope Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 InitialCC: astronomy-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes afaik, each .c or any source file should also contain license header to satisfy GPLv2+ You can see that on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing, GPLv2 and GPLv2+ points to same License text page => http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html But if you want to release it as GPLv2+ then ok. cvs done. Thanks! |