Bug 427663 (CVE-2007-6612)

Summary: CVE-2007-6612 mongrel: "DirHandler" Directory Traversal Vulnerability
Product: [Other] Security Response Reporter: Lubomir Kundrak <lkundrak>
Component: vulnerabilityAssignee: Red Hat Product Security <security-response-team>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: unspecifiedCC: sseago
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-6612
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-01-15 14:46:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Lubomir Kundrak 2008-01-06 12:47:10 UTC
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2007-6612 to the following vulnerability:

Directory traversal vulnerability in DirHandler (lib/mongrel/handlers.rb) in Mongrel 1.0.4 and 1.1.x before 1.1.3 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an HTTP request containing double-encoded sequences (".%252e").

References:

http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-December/004733.html
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-December/004736.html
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-December/004742.html
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/mongrel-users/2007-December/004743.html
http://mongrel.rubyforge.org/news.html

Comment 1 Scott Seago 2008-01-15 13:47:12 UTC
As this bug was introduced in 1.0.4 (1.0.3 and earlier are not susceptible), the
current fedora package (which is at 1.0.1) is not vulnerable. I will upgrade the
packages to 1.0.5 or 1.1.3 when I get the chance, though,

Comment 2 Tomas Hoger 2008-01-15 14:46:12 UTC
Thanks Scott for clarification.  As versions shipped in Fedora are not affected
by this issue, we will not be tracking this as security issue and I'm closing
this bug.

If you decide to update to newer version in Fedora, please submit such update as
enhancement, unless some other (future) security issue will be addressed there.