Bug 428021
Summary: | evolution-debuginfo missing files? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Brian Long <brilong> |
Component: | evolution | Assignee: | Matthew Barnes <mbarnes> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8 | CC: | mcrha |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-01-08 20:00:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Brian Long
2008-01-08 18:46:35 UTC
So I failed to enable updates-debuginfo when I installed the debuginfo packages. Shouldn't the -debuginfo packages require an exact version of their corresponding base package? For example, evolution-debuginfo-2.12.2-2.fc8 should require: evolution-2.12.2-2.fc8. This would avoid the simple mistake I made. :-) SPEC files generally do not have explicit requirements for their own debuginfo packages. RPM automates that whole process through its macros, which are defined in the redhat-rpm-config package and apply to all packages. I'm told the reason for the lack of an exact version requirement in the debuginfo packages is to allow you to disable your debuginfo repo and update your system without forcing you to first remove all your debuginfo packages. The problem is we don't really have an automated way of garbage collecting obsolete debuginfo packages that are just taking up space on one's system. In any case, this is beyond the scope of the Evolution packages so I'm going to close this as NOTABUG. |