Bug 428519

Summary:	[RFE] AutoErrata scheduled actions by a real username
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Network	Reporter:	daryl herzmann <akrherz>
Component:	RHN/Web Site	Assignee:	Grant Gainey <ggainey>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Amy Owens <aowens>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rhn500	CC:	aowens, duffy, rhn-bugs, tao
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	US=17266
Fixed In Version:	5.0.6	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-06-26 20:20:45 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	443075

Description daryl herzmann 2008-01-12 19:36:17 UTC

Sorry to keep filing nick picking RFEs on RHN :)

Currently, when errata is applied to auto-update machines, the RHN hosted
website shows this for the action summary:

"Errata Update scheduled by (none)"

Of course, something had to have scheduled it, not "(none)"  :)  

My suggestion would be to say something like:

Errata Update *automatically* scheduled by "Task-O-Matic"  or "RHN" or
"something", not "(none)" :)

thanks!

Comment 1 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 18:34:00 UTC

Hi,

Any commentary on this request? 

Yes, no, maybe, this request is a waste of our time! :)

daryl

Comment 2 Jeremy West 2008-04-18 20:27:29 UTC

Daryl,

Feature requests are never a waste of time, however could you please work
through your Red Hat technician to make sure we get all the information we need
to process this correctly?

Thanks
Jeremy West

Comment 3 daryl herzmann 2008-04-18 20:46:46 UTC

Hi Jeremy,

I am not sure what you mean by a 'Red Hat technician', we don't have a TAM.  I
did file a CRM ticket on this request, if that is what you are asking.

daryl

Comment 5 Grant Gainey 2008-04-23 23:27:11 UTC

So my current thought is to change "(none)" to "Red Hat" - since what we really
want to distinguish "Someone in my Org did this" from "something in the code did
this".  Subject to change - but that's the direction I'se heading.

Comment 6 Amy Owens 2008-04-25 14:51:28 UTC

all set on dev

Comment 7 Amy Owens 2008-06-02 18:48:57 UTC

*** Bug 449397 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8 Stephen Herr 2008-06-16 15:43:37 UTC

verified in qa