Bug 428579

Summary: Review Request: mkdst - Source repository to tarball release tool
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Warren Togami <wtogami>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jason Tibbitts <j>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review, notting
Target Milestone: ---Flags: j: fedora-review+
wtogami: fedora-cvs+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-19 19:09:50 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Warren Togami 2008-01-13 19:30:24 UTC 
http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mkdst.spec
http://togami.com/~warren/fedora/mkdst-0.1-1.fc8.src.rpm
Description:
Source repository and tarball release tool
Currently supports only bzr, but more VCS tools are planned.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2008-01-13 20:28:55 UTC 
The only nitpick I can find is that the first line of %description isn't
grammatically a sentence.  But honestly, there's nothing worth complaining
about.

* source files match upstream:
   6ea7d6db3fd86b2dc3eaf6c00012ebf5fd0fe81963b10e51d3b45d9578aa1629
   mkdst-0.1.tar.bz2
  (downloaded manually since there is no permanent location yet)
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper (none).
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64.
* package installs properly
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
   mkdst = 0.1-1.fc9
  =
   /bin/sh
* %check is not present; no test suite upstream
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

APPROVED