Bug 428623
| Summary: | too many subpackages? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Component: | vlgothic-fonts | Assignee: | Jens Petersen <petersen> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | eng-i18n-bugs, fonts-bugs |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-02-29 08:01:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jens Petersen
2008-01-14 08:58:55 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Description of problem: > The main VLGothic-fonts package is empty. > It would be better not to have a file list for it IMHO so it is not generated. agreed. > I think it is not really worth having a separate package VLGothic-fonts-docs > just for the license and readme. They are small enough that they can be > duplicated in the subpackage if necessary IMHO. and the sort of documentations should be provided in each subpackages without installing any extra packages. Actually I realised now VLGothic-fonts.noarch is a metapackage. Still I feel like it would be ok to just keep the main font in VLGothic-fonts and subpackage the other. |