Bug 429503
Summary: | Restyling of Procedure and Step styles for documentation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Publican | Reporter: | Susan Burgess <sburgess> |
Component: | publican | Assignee: | Michael Hideo <mhideo> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Michael Hideo <mhideo> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 2.0 | CC: | jfearn, mhideo, mmcallis, publican-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Documentation |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-25 04:14:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
the procedure tag will never be interactive. we need to keep the design relevant for all mediums especially ones that don't support javascript. I will look into themeing procedure differently (icons and all) could you throw me a few examples in books you have already built on docbot ? User afitzsim's account has been closed NOTABUG |
Pleae consider re-styling the Procedure and Step tags. > At present the Procedure title appears with the words Procedure and a > continuation number followed by the title. The numbers get out of > whack with the section numbers really quickly. > > I would prefer the title to appear alone - just like the OrderedList > title appears, I cant see what benefit the word Procedure and the > number add to it. > > Procedure could have an icon - something like a todo list. "Action" or > "Do this" indicating that the user needs to do something here! > and/or even a faint grey background. And the steps could be > preceded by an elegant arrow, or the numbered font could be a font > size larger. > > Also could the Procedure tag be a roll up, so that users can expand > and contract them?