Bug 430040
| Summary: | Provide a means to organize users into a tree to reflect organization structure | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] freeIPA | Reporter: | Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan> |
| Component: | Documentation | Assignee: | David O'Brien <daobrien> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Chandrasekar Kannan <ckannan> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 2.0 | CC: | benl, dpal, jgalipea, mgregg, rcritten, shillman, ssorce, yzhang |
| Target Milestone: | v2 release | Keywords: | Documentation |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2010-02-23 17:34:16 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Pretty sure this is not a 1.0 feature. Moving to 2.0. Please add any additional info about how this might develop (in either version). Is this actually a bug or something that requires doc? If we're talking about using groups, this is already documented. |
Ticket #74 (new enhancement) Opened 3 months ago Provide a means to organize users into a tree to reflect organization structure Reported by: kmacmill Assigned to: Priority: major Milestone: release-2 Component: documentation Version: Keywords: Cc: Description ΒΆ 3) There appears to be no interface for organizing users into OU's - am I missing something or is this coming in a future release? Future release I think. Right now you will have to use groups. How would you like this feature to look? Let the fact that there is an ldap tree leak out? Or have something more abstract, like the ability to create departments, groups, etc. and organize people into an org chart? Pete / Simo - in the past I think you have argued against reflecting organizational structure in the ldap tree. Can you elaborate?