Bug 430076

Summary: cupsaddsmb does not track OrderDependencies, allowing collisions
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Component: cupsAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.1   
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 21:59:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 248550    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Tim Waugh 2008-01-24 13:14:32 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #248550 +++

Description of problem:
cupsaddsmb does not track OrderDependencies, allowing collisions which can cause
PostScript errors. 

Looks like this affects Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 as well.  The upstream fix
has gone into the 1.3.x branch but has not gone into the 1.2.x branch.

Comment 3 Phil Knirsch 2008-04-30 15:47:53 UTC
Proposing for RHEL-5.3 and granting Devel ACK.

Read ya, Phil


Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2008-06-02 20:22:19 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 21:59:12 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-0201.html