Bug 430134

Summary:	gfs_quota hangs in do_list()
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Abhijith Das <adas>
Component:	gfs-kmod	Assignee:	Abhijith Das <adas>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	GFS Bugs <gfs-bugs>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.2
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHBA-2008-0348	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-05-21 15:37:22 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	225199
Bug Blocks:

Comment 1 Abhijith Das 2008-01-24 18:31:59 UTC

I missed checking in this fix for RHEL5. Checking it into RHEL5 cvs now.

cvs commit -m "fix for bug 430134 - Added functionality to GFS_IOCTL_SUPER to
provide metadata of the hidden quota file. This allows the userland tool
gfs_quota to perform efficient list operations (bz 430133)." ioctl.c
Checking in ioctl.c;
/cvs/cluster/cluster/gfs-kernel/src/gfs/ioctl.c,v  <--  ioctl.c
new revision: 1.13.2.5; previous revision: 1.13.2.4
done

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2008-01-24 18:36:13 UTC

This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 15:37:22 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0348.html