Bug 430169

Summary: SiS 662 displays vertical, fuzzy lines when using sis driver, but not when using vesa driver.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael LeMay <lemaymd>
Component: xorg-x11-drv-sisAssignee: X/OpenGL Maintenance List <xgl-maint>
Status: CLOSED CANTFIX QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 8CC: mcepl
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-02-26 15:39:18 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michael LeMay 2008-01-24 22:59:24 UTC
Description of problem:
When using the sis x.org driver with a SiS 662 integrated graphics card on an
Intel D201GLY2 motherboard, vertical lines with quickly varying horizontal lines
extending out from them appear on the screen at all times.  By using a custom
"premium" driver, as described in the last post on the following page, the issue
is resolved: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=463077&page=8  The lines
also disappear when the VESA driver is used, but that is far too slow.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.9.3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install and use xorg-x11-drv-sis
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Vertical lines through screen

Expected results:
No vertical lines through screen

Additional info:

Comment 1 Matěj Cepl 2008-01-25 00:58:12 UTC
Reporter, I am sorry but I have a bad news for you. According to
http://www.winischhofer.eu/linuxsispart4.shtml#download, Thomas Winischhofer
"[t]he premium version. This version is only available in binary form and for a
fee. It has advanced features not available in the Free Version.", so I don't
think we can carry it. Do I understand correctly that somebody ripped out a
binary driver out of the Thomas' distribution for-fee tarball?

Comment 2 Matěj Cepl 2008-02-25 23:09:16 UTC
Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in
one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you.

Comment 3 Michael LeMay 2008-02-25 23:26:17 UTC
I apologize, I missed the notification of the previous comment.  Yes, the driver
I was using was taken from a for-fee tarball.  I was hoping that the redhat team
could port whatever techniques he's using in that distribution to the free,
default driver, since the non-free driver I'm using hasn't been supported in
quite awhile and is quite flaky (segfaults with certain xorg.conf
configurations, etc.).  Perhaps that violates RedHat's philosophy, however.  Thanks!

Comment 4 Matěj Cepl 2008-02-26 15:39:18 UTC
It’s not the question of philosophy, we just cannot read binary any better than
you can :-).

Closing as CANTFIX


Comment 5 Michael LeMay 2008-02-26 16:06:39 UTC
The source is available for download here:
http://www.winischhofer.net/sis/sisp.tar.gz  Intel has also just released a
source driver, but it comes from the same author and I have no experience with
it:
http://downloadcenter.intel.com/Detail_Desc.aspx?agr=N&Inst=Yes&ProductID=2873&DwnldID=15443&strOSs=39&OSFullName=Linux*&lang=eng