Bug 430427
| Summary: | Review Request: BrOffice.org - Brazilian release of OpenOffice.org | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Davidson Paulo <davidsonpaulo> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Davidson Paulo <davidsonpaulo> |
| Status: | CLOSED CANTFIX | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | diegobz, fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-01-28 20:09:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 358021 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | |||
|
Description
Davidson Paulo
2008-01-28 00:20:21 UTC
I glanced at the specfile and I have to say that I do not think what's done in the %post scriptlets of each of these packages is going to be acceptable for Fedora. Have you communicated with the Fedora maintainer of OpenOffice to see if there's a reasonable way of handling what you're trying to do? Those packages are just meta-packages that change most of references of "OpenOffice.org" to "BrOffice.org". Once BrOffice.org is not more than OpenOffice.org translated to pt_BR there is no need to create entire new packages. The way I packaged, when you install broffice.org-core do you have a BrOffice.org installation. Removing it gives you back your OpenOffice.org. The other broffice.org-* packages are just meta-packages, once people that know BrOffice.org will install broffice.org-writer instead openoffice.org-writer. I have communicated with Caolan, he is the maintainer of OpenOffice.org packages isn't he? Thanks for your feedback. Yeah, sed-ing and moving of files that belong to other packages isn't really kosher. There are many signicant issues with doing this kind of thing: rpm -V on the openoffice packages will fail if this package is installed. An openoffice package update wipes out any changes made by this package. Really, this isn't the right way to do things. I chatted with Caolan on IRC and he pointed me at bug 358021 and mentioned that this should all wait until the lawyers give us all the set of requirements which must be followed because there's a chance that everything necessary can be done within the Brazilian langpack. He hopes to hear something in a week or two. I made those packages as a proof of concept, just to show how few are the differences between OpenOffice.org and BrOffice.org and to see what problems would need to be fixed yet. I hope they are useful in some way. Sorry if I don't done things the right way, I'm here to help the better I can. I'll wait your feedback. By now, thank you very much. Oh, OK. The procedure you've used is the one for submitting new packages in Fedora, so you've been getting package review feedback. If you aren't actually submitting these packages for inclusion in Fedora then I'd suggest that you either close this ticket or change the component to something other than Package Review. Once the packages are not acceptable, I think this ticket may be closed. I'm going to post a comment on ticket #358021 with the URL's for the packages. Once again, thanks for the feedback. :-) |