Bug 431713

Summary:	HA LVM should prevent users from running an invalid setup (2)
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5	Reporter:	Jonathan Earl Brassow <jbrassow>
Component:	rgmanager	Assignee:	Jonathan Earl Brassow <jbrassow>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	5.2	CC:	avijayak, cluster-maint, edamato, lhh
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-01-20 20:57:01 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	431705
Bug Blocks:	432994

Description Jonathan Earl Brassow 2008-02-06 16:49:39 UTC

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #431705 +++

A customer was having issues with their HA LVM setup after 6 months of proper
operation... after much searching, it can down to an improper setup.

We can check for this, and should.

The problem was that they placed the volume group that was to be shared into
/etc/lvm/lvm.conf:volume_list.

-- Additional comment from pm-rhel on 2008-02-06 11:37 EST --
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red
Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release.  Product Management has requested
further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential
inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed
products.  This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update
release.

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 20:57:01 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0101.html

Comment 5 Lon Hohberger 2010-01-27 18:07:56 UTC

*** Bug 432994 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***