Bug 432080
| Summary: | Review Request: cstream - General-purpose stream-handling tool | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Hans Ulrich Niedermann <rhbugs> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Parag AN(पराग) <panemade> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | panemade:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-02-11 23:05:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Hans Ulrich Niedermann
2008-02-08 18:58:43 UTC
1)you may like to add distag to release as
Release: 3%{?dist}
2)good if you add tests to %doc that will create rpmlint warning to silent it
add to %prep
chmod 644 tests/test1.sh
3) CFLAGS value is
CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables'
So you don't need to add -Wall. Also, any reason to add
"-Wextra -Wno-unused-parameter -Werror" to make install?
1) Of course. Added. 2) The Makefile.am remarks that the tests do not work (due to the output format being slightly different). I'd presume running them at %check time or shipping them as docs does not make sense, then. 3) Can a double -Wall hurt? Adding "-Wall -Wextra -Werror" makes it clear which set of warnings/errors we want, so that's what I'd go for. Compilation should be done before "make install", so I do not deem it necessary to define the CFLAGS there. Updated package at http://ndim.fedorapeople.org/cstream/2.7.4-4.fc8/ * Sat Feb 09 2008 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <hun> - 2.7.4-4 - Add %%{?dist} to Release: * Fri Feb 08 2008 Hans Ulrich Niedermann <hun> - 2.7.4-3 - More compile warnings (-Wall -Wextra -Werror). - Redacted description down to the most important points. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i386). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=413928 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. eab4c98afef79766dd61a6a36dec845a cstream-2.7.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + Compiler flags are honored correctly. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. SHOULD: Though I am not happy with extra flags to compiler just because it gives extra information, its ok to add them here. APPROVED. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cstream Short Description: General-purpose stream-handling tool Owners: ndim Branches: F-7 F-8 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: Yes cvs done. cstream-2.7.4-4 packages are in rawhide and the update queue for F-7, F-8. Thanks for review and CVS. |