Bug 432265
Summary: | Review Request: astronomy-bookmarks - Fedora astronomy bookmarks | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Marek Mahut <mmahut> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, kevin, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | lkundrak:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-07 10:54:07 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 508126 |
Description
Marek Mahut
2008-02-10 18:15:02 UTC
Release: 1%{?dist} Somewhere I heard that dist tag is not needed in cross-release noarch packages (was it screensaver-frogs review?). Your bookmark file embeds a couple of images/icons. Are you sure those are freely redistributable? Legal team, are these icons an issue? I know we have these also in default-bookmarks. 15:24:41 spot marek: if you want to keep the icons, you need to get explicit approval from each trademark holder to redistribute the icon under the GFDL. 15:25:20 spot marek: and honestly, I'm not sure that Fedora would permit that. 15:25:34 spot (since the Fedora logo is one of the icons) Spec file updated, removed icons, http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/astronomy-bookmarks/astronomy-bookmarks-1-2.fc8.src.rpm I find no other problems. APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: astronomy-bookmarks Short Description: Fedora astronomy bookmarks Owners: mmahut Branches: F-8 InitialCC: astronomy-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes Should we really be importing this before firefox is able to handle more than one bookmarks package? Is there a bug filed on that? (In reply to comment #7) > Should we really be importing this before firefox is able to handle more than > one bookmarks package? Is there a bug filed on that? There's no bug. Discussion on #fedora-devel has been based on idea that the bookmark file is included in firefox itself, which is not true. The standard bookmark file is in separate package default-bookmarks and thus can be excluded from the spin. Sure, but then they both provide the same files, so there should be an explicit 'Conflicts' here? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts "Keep in mind that implicit conflicts are NEVER acceptable. If your package conflicts with another package, then you must either resolve the conflict, or mark it with Conflicts:" (In reply to comment #9) > Sure, but then they both provide the same files, so there should be an explicit > 'Conflicts' here? You're right, completely forgot about it. My spec file and SRPM are updated. Chris Aillon told me there are no plans to implement multiple-bookmarks-files capability into Firefox... So I guess this is our only solution even if it's ugly. Yeah, pretty non ideal. ;( Oh well, sometimes thats the way it goes... cvs done. Build. Thank you Lubomir and Kevin for this review. |