Bug 432457

Summary:	[kn_IN] Translation Error in File
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	A S Alam <aalam>
Component:	gtk2	Assignee:	Matthias Clasen <mclasen>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	9	CC:	i18n-bugs, mclasen, mshao, pertusus, svenkate
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	Translation
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-12-11 07:00:01 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	432933

Description A S Alam 2008-02-12 04:46:21 UTC

Description of problem:
GTK's Translation is more than expected.
Error Message on Termianl 

"Gtk-WARNING **: Whoever translated default:LTR did so wrongly."

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gtk+-1.2.10-59.fc8.i386

How reproducible:
Everytime during runing GTK application (gedit, evince)

Steps to Reproduce:
1. run evince from Terminal for Language
2. check terminal
3.
  
Actual results:
error Message "Gtk-WARNING **: Whoever translated default:LTR did so wrongly."

Expected results:
should be clean Terminal
(Need to fix in translation)

Additional info:
http://l10n.gnome.org/POT/gtk+.gtk-2-12/gtk+.gtk-2-12.kn.po
Branches: gtk+2-12

Comment 1 A S Alam 2008-02-12 04:58:00 UTC

Please Make sure Commit also should be Trunk, it seems people don't commit to
trunk, which can revert back all fixed changes and Translation status is really
low for Trunk (<30%)

Comment 2 Ankit Patel 2008-02-12 04:59:33 UTC

Hi Shanky,

Can you please look into this bug?

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2008-05-14 05:08:34 UTC

Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 4 Tony Fu 2008-09-10 03:09:09 UTC

requested by Jens Petersen (#27995)

Comment 5 Patrice Dumas 2008-10-01 22:20:21 UTC

Are you sure this is a gtk+ bug and not a gtk2 bug?

Comment 6 Shankar Prasad 2008-10-03 06:29:03 UTC

I have already corrected the error in the gtk+ and submitted to svn. I remember similar kind of error (gtk) was reported by Aman (I don't remember the exact bug no. and the module name) and I had corrected it.

Shanky

Comment 7 A S Alam 2008-12-11 06:59:42 UTC

yes, it was gtk2 only bug and it is fixed already.
Thanks

gtk2-2.21.12-1.fc9