Bug 432868
Summary: | New image initially unsharp when switching between images | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Sigrid Philippsen <siggi> |
Component: | f-spot | Assignee: | Christian Krause <chkr> |
Status: | CLOSED UPSTREAM | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 13 | CC: | chkr, nphilipp, ruben |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-06-28 20:53:08 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Sigrid Philippsen
2008-02-14 20:40:25 UTC
I've built 0.4.3.1 as a potential update for Fedora 8, while it's not in the updates-testing repository yet, you can grab the RPM from http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/f-spot/0.4.3.1/1.fc8/ would you please be able to check if you can still reproduce the bug? We're on Fedora 9 now and have checked f-spot-0.4.3.1-1.fc9.x86_64 which shows the same behaviour as f-spot-0.4.2-5.fc9.x86_64 which we had before. This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I still see this on Fedora 11 with f-spot-0.5.0.3-8.fc11.x86_64. (In reply to comment #4) > I still see this on Fedora 11 with f-spot-0.5.0.3-8.fc11.x86_64. I've discussed the issue with upstream: The progressive load is a feature to make sure that the user immediately sees at least a blurry picture when displaying a large image or working on a slow machine (which is better than a black screen or an unresponsive UI). Please see the discussion in the associated bug in upstream's bug tracker. (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I still see this on Fedora 11 with f-spot-0.5.0.3-8.fc11.x86_64. > > I've discussed the issue with upstream: > > The progressive load is a feature to make sure that the user immediately sees > at least a blurry picture when displaying a large image or working on a slow > machine (which is better than a black screen or an unresponsive UI). > > Please see the discussion in the associated bug in upstream's bug tracker. The point of this bug is rather: "The user doesn't want to see a _blurry_ picture because it makes her feel dizzy". Waiting for the image to display isn't that much of a problem, we already know that experience from presentations in Open Office ;-). Of course, pre-caching the next image and immediate display as described in the upstream bug http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343856 would also solve this problem. > The point of this bug is rather: "The user doesn't want to see a _blurry_
> picture because it makes her feel dizzy". Waiting for the image to display
> isn't that much of a problem, we already know that experience from
> presentations in Open Office ;-). Of course, pre-caching the next image and
> immediate display as described in the upstream bug
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343856 would also solve this problem.
Basically there are 2 options to solve the problem of the slow loading of images (for now):
- display the blurry picture (chosen by upstream)
- display a black window/just wait until the new image is ready (requested by you and the bug author)
Both options have their pros and cons and I don't want to overrule upstream's decision unless it would be really necessary...
Right now I'm actively communicating the problem with upstream.
(In reply to comment #7) > > The point of this bug is rather: "The user doesn't want to see a _blurry_ > > picture because it makes her feel dizzy". Waiting for the image to display > > isn't that much of a problem, we already know that experience from > > presentations in Open Office ;-). Of course, pre-caching the next image and > > immediate display as described in the upstream bug > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343856 would also solve this problem. > > Basically there are 2 options to solve the problem of the slow loading of > images (for now): > - display the blurry picture (chosen by upstream) > - display a black window/just wait until the new image is ready (requested by > you and the bug author) 2 more: - display e.g. a progress bar or throbber of some sort like eog - make loading quicker (e.g. by preloading the image) ;-) Eog has both, it not only has a progressbar except when in fullscreen, but also loads 10mpx images in fractions of a second. > Both options have their pros and cons and I don't want to overrule upstream's > decision unless it would be really necessary... > > Right now I'm actively communicating the problem with upstream. Thanks, I appreciate that. Mind, we're not against some kind of feedback that an image is being loaded (even with pre-loading you might flip too quickly through your images), our problem is that the blurred preview really makes your head spin when flipping through a number of pictures (e.g. after returning from a vacation when sorting out which ones you're gonna keep). It would be nice if you could just switch off the blurred preview if you have that problem with it. This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping Fedora 11 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-06-25. Fedora 11 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. This problem is still present in F-13. (In reply to comment #11) > This problem is still present in F-13. Yes, but there is really not much what can be done here by the packagers: - that kind of image loading is a deliberate decision of upstream - it is not a major show-stopper nor a security problem - there is an upstream bug report http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343856 - I have ping'ed upstream again about the current status (by email) So since I can't do very much here, I'll close this bug report as UPSTREAM. I'm subscribed to the upstream report and if there is any patch available, I'll build a new Fedora package. (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > This problem is still present in F-13. > > Yes, but there is really not much what can be done here by the packagers: > > - that kind of image loading is a deliberate decision of upstream A rather bad decision by the way. One that's pretty high up on the list of solving (but doing that properly is a bit of work). Ruben (F-Spot Maintainer) |