Bug 434880
| Summary: | Review Request: tanukiwrapper - Java Service Wrapper | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jesus M. Rodriguez <jesusr> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | dbhole, fedora-package-review, itamar, msuchy, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2008-10-22 22:40:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Jesus M. Rodriguez
2008-02-25 23:05:19 UTC
I need sponsorship in order to become a package maintainer. Hmm, tanukiwrapper already has a maintainer for the devel branch according to pkgdb (dbhole), and two co-maintainers for other branches but no "main" maintainer for them: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/tanukiwrapper I was trying to take over this package but I didn't have the right credentials to take ownership of it. I was told to resubmit it for review to beat the deadline. I would be happy to take the package for fedora 7 and 8 branches. I am jmrodri one of the two co-maintainers listed on the page from comment #3. Looking at this old review I'm still a bit confused. I believe the java team has at least one sponsor who can give new folks access. This package is already in the distro, and there's already a merge review ticket open on it. I'm going to go ahead and close this ticket as a dup of the existing review ticket. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 226477 *** |