Bug 435776
Summary: | BackupPC defualts should be more secure | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Joe Krahn <krahn> |
Component: | BackupPC | Assignee: | Johan Cwiklinski <fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 6 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-03 21:24:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Joe Krahn
2008-03-03 20:08:09 UTC
I'm not going to do this. It's a configuration issue, not a packaging one. You should contact upstream to tell them you point of vue, security considerations are BackupPC related, and should be provided by the dev team, not in a Fedora package I guess. Anyways, if you have ideas to improve this package, feel free to submit me relevant spec files and patches. OK, that is reasonable. I thought it was worth sending in because packagers sometimes will add security enhancements, and perhaps someone experienced with security issues would get a chance to look at this. For now, I will try to get the BackupPC dev team to better address this. |