Bug 436601

Summary:	After installing mathml-fonts firefox still complains about missing fonts
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Alexey Torkhov <atorkhov>
Component:	firefox	Assignee:	Gecko Maintainer <gecko-bugs-nobody>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	8	CC:	fonts-bugs, rdieter, robatino
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2008-03-31 19:35:12 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Alexey Torkhov 2008-03-08 08:08:23 UTC

Description of problem:
I've installed mathml-fonts but firefox still show error message when visiting
page with mathml:
"To properly display the MathML on this page you need to install the following
fonts:

Math1, Math2, Math4, Symbol..."

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mathml-fonts-1.0-21.fc6
firefox-2.0.0.12-1.fc8

How reproducible:
Always.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install mathml-fonts
2. Visit page with mathml
  
Actual results:
Error message appears.

Expected results:
No error message.

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rex Dieter 2008-03-08 13:00:22 UTC

Old mozilla/firefox bug (see also bug #133709), where it insists on nonfree
fonts that we can't distibute.  The fonts as distributed in mathml-fonts are
(should be!) good enough to display any(most) mathml.

Comment 2 Nicolas Mailhot 2008-03-09 22:09:53 UTC

Additionnally we distribute stix which may be more complete than mathml-fonts
nowadays

Comment 3 Christopher Aillon 2008-03-31 18:56:25 UTC

I believe this is fixed in rawhide (and F9 Beta)... would be good if someone
could confirm that.

Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2008-03-31 19:02:06 UTC

confirmed, no warnings here on rawhide (using firefox-3.0-0.50... )

Comment 5 Christopher Aillon 2008-03-31 19:35:12 UTC

The upstream patch to fix this was somewhat large and I'd like to avoid taking
non-security or stability fixes for Firefox 2 at this point, so I think this
should just be resolved NEXTRELEASE as we'll pick it up in Fedora 9.