Bug 436821

Summary: Install problem: Missing XML/LibXML/SAX/Parser.pm
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Horst H. von Brand <vonbrand>
Component: perl-XML-SAXAssignee: Stepan Kasal <kasal>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: mmaslano, robin.norwood
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-27 08:07:04 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Error message on updating none

Description Horst H. von Brand 2008-03-10 17:30:44 UTC 
Description of problem:
Updating to today's rawhide I got the attached error message. The package checks
out clean (rpm -V).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-XML-SAX-0.16-5.fc9.noarch

How reproducible:
Only on upgrading, installing the package again gives no messages.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Horst H. von Brand 2008-03-10 17:30:44 UTC 
Created attachment 297471 [details]
Error message on updating
Comment 2 Marcela Mašláňová 2008-03-21 10:02:18 UTC 
I can't reproduce it. I updated it from perl-XML-SAX-0.16-4.fc9.noarch to
perl-XML-SAX-0.16-5.fc9.noarch and nothing had happened.

Do you from which version did you update?
Comment 3 Horst H. von Brand 2008-03-27 00:03:20 UTC 
Nope, no record of the earlier perl-XML-SAX in /var/log/yum.log*

In any case, I have updated this machine daily most of the time. Unless
something blocked its update, it must have been the latest version before that.

Sorry not to be able to help more.
Comment 4 Marcela Mašláňová 2008-03-27 08:07:04 UTC 
I'm sorry, but I can't reproduce it. I've already checked the spec file, but
everything looks fine.