Bug 437154
| Summary: | Rebase sanitycheck reports should be a bugzilla admin function | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Community] Bugzilla | Reporter: | Noura El hawary <nelhawar> |
| Component: | Bugzilla General | Assignee: | Simon Green <sgreen> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 3.6 | CC: | ebaak, kbaker, sgreen |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2012-06-19 04:11:15 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Noura El hawary
2008-03-12 17:24:23 UTC
Probably should be an additional argument to the sanitycheck.cgi UI similar to the params that can be passed in to rebuild keyword cache, etc. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sanitycheck.cgi?rebasereports=1 or something similar. (In reply to comment #1) > Probably should be an additional argument to the sanitycheck.cgi UI similar to > the params that can be passed in to rebuild keyword cache, etc. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sanitycheck.cgi?rebasereports=1 > > or something similar. Dave, We are talking about the sanitycheck.pl in RHBZ_2.18,, not sure if we are going to replace it with sanitycheck.cgi in 3.2 or it will still be used when we upgrade. as for the current RHBZ_2.18 I think it will be a good idea to pass argument to delete the files we don't want under data/sanitycheck, but we will have to be able to run the script ourselves to pass it this argument whenever we want to delete the files , so can we run the sanitycheck.pl script or sys admin will also have to do it? Noura The reason I mentioned the cgi over the command line script is that the cgi is our only interface into the sanitycheck code on the live bugzilla. We can't set any param values due to the data/params file being managed by cfengine. And having sysadmins run the sanitycheck.pl with a command line option to rebase the reports doesn't really save us much over just having them remove the data/sanitycheck/* files. sanitycheck.cgi still exists in 3.2 as well so we can port the option over to it at the appropriate time. Dave Red Hat Bugzilla is now using version 3.2 of the Bugzilla codebase and therefore this bug will need to be re-verified against the new release. With the updated code this bug may no longer be relevant or may have been fixed in the new code. Updating bug version to 3.2. Red Hat Bugzilla is now using version 3.4 of the Bugzilla codebase and therefore this feature will need to be implemented against the new release. Updating bug version to 3.2. Red Hat has now upgraded to Bugzilla 3.6 and this bug will now be reassigned to that version. It would be helpful to the Bugzilla Development Team if this bug is verified to still be an issue with the latest version. If it is no longer an issue, then feel free to close, otherwise please comment that it is still a problem and we will try to address the issue as soon as we can. Thanks Bugzilla Development Team Haven't heard any noise for this bug since it was created, and Noura has now left Red Hat. -- simon |