This service will be undergoing maintenance at 00:00 UTC, 2016-08-01. It is expected to last about 1 hours

Bug 437474

Summary: Nessus server package (nessus-core) violates license
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jan-Oliver Wagner <jan-oliver.wagner>
Component: nessus-coreAssignee: Andreas Bierfert <andreas.bierfert>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: tcallawa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-03-31 15:17:26 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 182235    

Description Jan-Oliver Wagner 2008-03-14 09:46:21 EDT
Description of problem: 
The Nessus server is packaged with OpenSSL support for
current and all past Fedora releases. The license of Nessus
does not permit this.

Additional info:
In fact, the openssl exception of some Nessus modules
does not extend to the actual server:
In directory nessus-core/nessus (the client) you will find:
COPYING
COPYING.OpenSSL
while in nessus-core/nessusd (the server) you will find only:
COPYING

Naturally, it does not make much sense to configure package
without SSL support to eliminate the license problem as sensitive
information will get transferred in clear text.

BTW: this mistake was done by virtually any GNU/Linux distribution.

PS: The Nessus-fork OpenVAS (www.openvas.org) has replaced OpenSSL by
GNU/TLS and thus resolves the packaging/distribution problem.
Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-03-24 09:54:25 EDT
Contacted upstream to see if they can resolve the license incompatibility.
Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2008-03-31 15:17:26 EDT
I spoke to upstream, and they don't consider this a problem, because OpenSSL is
widely considered a "system library", thus, it falls under this clause in GPLv2
(there is a similar clause in GPLv3):

However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not include
anything that is normally distributed (in either source or binary form) with the
major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which
the executable runs, unless that component itself accompanies the executable. 

Admittedly, the fact that they use the exception clause for half of their code,
but not the other half is confusing, but this is acceptable for Fedora.