Bug 437563

Summary: Add UI status when granting or revoking Sat Admin role to user
Product: Red Hat Satellite 5 Reporter: Mike McCune <mmccune>
Component: WebUIAssignee: Shannon Hughes <shughes>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Preethi Thomas <pthomas>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 520CC: cperry
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://test10-64.rhndev.redhat.com/rhn/admin/multiorg/Users.do
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sat530 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-09-10 19:47:34 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 456998    

Description Mike McCune 2008-03-14 21:37:51 UTC
When on the /rhn/admin/multiorg/Users.do page and you grant or revoke the sat
admin role you don't get any messaging as to what happened.

Just suggesting we add a 'Sat Admin role granted' or revoked in the status area
on the page.

Comment 1 Shannon Hughes 2009-02-04 15:07:53 UTC
added messages for both adding sat admin roles and removing roles. 

test plan: 

1) be logged in as sat admin
2) go to the admin tab and lock on users
3) toggle sat admin rights
4) confirm messages:

example, 

"Removed Satellite Administrator role from fredf"

Comment 2 Preethi Thomas 2009-02-10 16:49:11 UTC
verified.

Comment 3 wes hayutin 2009-07-31 12:12:16 UTC
Added Satellite Administrator role to westest

Removed Satellite Administrator role from westest

release pending

Comment 4 Brandon Perkins 2009-09-10 19:47:34 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2009-1434.html