Bug 437986
Summary: | traceback after successful install | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Matthias Clasen <mclasen> |
Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Panu Matilainen <pmatilai> |
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | pnasrat |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-12-15 08:47:51 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Matthias Clasen
2008-03-18 15:31:24 UTC
firstboot doesn't do anything with rpm, so this seems like rpm was installed incorrectly. Reassigning to rpm first for some bright ideas. Yeah, a closer look revealed that anaconda somehow managed to leave me with an install that didn't have rpm-libs on it. The rest of rpm was there... Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping I'd guess this was temporary anaconda breakage of the day. Closing as there's no evidence that rpm bug was involved, if this was a more common occurrance we'd probably heard more of it long time ago... |