Bug 438077
Summary: | plugin SEGV | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2> | ||||
Component: | java-1.6.0-openjdk | Assignee: | Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | langel | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened | ||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | powerpc | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-04-17 18:16:51 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
David Woodhouse
2008-03-18 21:43:55 UTC
Created attachment 298455 [details]
error log from jvm
I went back to java-1.7.0-icedtea-1.7.0.0-0.29.b24.fc9 to test, and it fails there similarly. I'll try an even older version; I'm sure it was working once. Looks like it was 1.7.0.0-0.22.b23.snapshot.fc9 which I used to have installed on F8 (which iirc was working fine), but that also fails similar to the above. Hm, this works on two other machines (32-bit and 64-bit) running rawhide. Just not on my main laptop, which had various issues with its upgrade (like glibc going missing, most of GNOME being broken and having to be removed and reinstalled). I assume it's a local problem. Indeed it was a local problem -- I had two lines in /etc/hosts which started ::1 localhost.ipv6 localhost.localdomain localhost localhost.ipv6 localhost.localdomain localhost ... and went on like that for about 150KiB each. How they got there, I have no idea. You should be able to reproduce this, and it might even be possible that a malicious remote site could do it too, with _many_ PTR records for a single address. This is working fine for me (using java-1.6.0-openjdk), even with the PTR records. Closing. What PTR records did you set up? Did you test with an /etc/hosts file like the one I described? It was purely speculation that it might be possible to trigger it with PTR records. |