Bug 438168
Summary: | man-page is incomplete | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Jan Hutař <jhutar> | ||||
Component: | yum | Assignee: | James Antill <james.antill> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 5.2 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | rc | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2008-0388 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-05-21 14:22:23 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Jan Hutař
2008-03-19 14:42:15 UTC
note that --tolerant does nothing, so I'm not 100% sure what to do about that atm. The others are easy-ish additions. (In reply to comment #1) > note that --tolerant does nothing, > so I'm not 100% sure what to do about that atm. I would just add a note about it to the man-page. It is better to say "this is not implemented jet" or "this is here only for backwards compatibility now", then nothing. Thanks for a quick response! Created attachment 300071 [details]
include grouperase
Hello, "grouperase" is still not included (only "groupremove" is), but I do not know what is the policy here and it is definitely not important. What do you think? Thank you in advance, Jan Well grouperase is just an alias for groupremove, on the latest upstream if you do: # yum help grouperase groupremove GROUP... Remove the packages in a group from your system alias: grouperase ...so I'd say not a bug?:) ... the obvious counter is groupinstall and groupupdate, but we might make those different one day. I'd prefer to just ignore this, at least for 5.2 ... but if it's a regression the fix is pretty small. The regression comment was because I was thinking about the "yum -d" vs. "yum -R" problem ... just commenting on too much at once :). So anyway, unless you object, I'd rather just drop it as "it's not a real command it's an alias" excuse. That is perfectly OK to me. Thank you. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0388.html |