Bug 438816

Summary: HA LVM: lvm_by_vg.sh is stripping tags from all the VGs and not from only the configured one.
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Simone Gotti <simone.gotti>
Component: rgmanagerAssignee: Jonathan Earl Brassow <jbrassow>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.2CC: cluster-maint, edamato, lhh
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHBA-2008-0353 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-21 14:31:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 438997    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Fix described problem in lvm_by_vg.sh none

Description Simone Gotti 2008-03-25 13:35:19 UTC 
Description of problem:

If I have at least 2 services using HA LVM (1 lvm resource for every service
using of course different VGs) and they are both active on the same node when I
stop one of the services (so one vg) the tags are removed from all the VGs due
to a missing vgname parameter in the call to vgchange --deltag

The attached patch should fix it and also a missing initialization of my_name in
vg_status that will report something like this:

<err>    WARNING: vg01 should not be active
<err>    WARNING:  does not own vg01
<err>    WARNING: Attempting shutdown of vg01

instead of:

<err>    WARNING: vg01 should not be active
<err>    WARNING: node01 does not own vg01
<err>    WARNING: Attempting shutdown of vg01


Thanks!
Bye!
Comment 1 Simone Gotti 2008-03-25 13:35:19 UTC 
Created attachment 299019 [details]
Fix described problem in lvm_by_vg.sh
Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2008-05-21 14:31:05 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2008-0353.html