Bug 438994
Summary: | pam should enforce a couple password quality checks | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Steve Grubb <sgrubb> |
Component: | pam | Assignee: | Tomas Mraz <tmraz> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | mkoci |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-20 22:04:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Steve Grubb
2008-03-26 13:57:49 UTC
1) and 2) seem reasonable and can be added to pam_cracklib. The 3) is very security critical thing to do correctly. It will have to be implemented very carefully in regards to timing attacks and so on. It also seems to me as really questionable thing whether it is useful at all (apart from giving a check on some list of items in some weird security standard). It will also need a standalone helper for SELinux as the module itself cannot read /etc/shadow. This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0222.html |