Bug 439318

Summary: rename software transaction viewer
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Rahul Sundaram <sundaram>
Component: gnome-packagekitAssignee: Robin Norwood <robin.norwood>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: richard, smohan
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-04-10 19:12:41 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Rahul Sundaram 2008-03-28 01:49:32 UTC
Description of problem:

"Software transcation viewer" isn't a very meaningful description nor it is
easily translated. Maybe something like "Software Log" is better. The word
"transaction" occurs in relationship to PackageKit in more than one occasion.
Those need to be reviewed and better wordings chosen. Another example is the
cryptic message from g-p-m when I try to suspend with a "transcation" running. I
am not sure whether that comes from g-p-m or PackageKit.

Comment 1 Matthias Clasen 2008-03-28 03:29:18 UTC
The window title is "Update history" in git, and it is accessible from the
update viewer. We should just nuke the separate menuitem for it.



Comment 2 Richard Hughes 2008-03-28 12:46:22 UTC
I've added upstream NotShowIn=GNOME;KDE;XFCE; on advice of Matthias, so that it
won't show up by default in the menus, but still can be added manually if needed
using the menu editor.

The other text you are seeing is:


ret = dbus_g_proxy_call (inhibit->priv->proxy_gpm, "Inhibit", &error,
			 G_TYPE_STRING, _("Software Update Applet"),
			 G_TYPE_STRING, _("A transaction that cannot be interrupted is running"),
			 G_TYPE_INVALID,
			 G_TYPE_UINT, &inhibit->priv->cookie,
			 G_TYPE_INVALID);

I agree it isn't very clear. Better ideas welcome.



Comment 3 Matthias Clasen 2008-04-10 19:12:41 UTC
I think we should close this bug, as the main purpose has been met. 
Ongoing language improvements throughout PK don't need to be tracked on a
word-by-word basis in bugzilla.