Bug 439325
Summary: | no way to select multiple packages | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rahul Sundaram <sundaram> |
Component: | gnome-packagekit | Assignee: | Robin Norwood <robin.norwood> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 9 | CC: | dakingun, richard, smohan, splewako |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | MoveUpstream |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-07-04 10:06:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Rahul Sundaram
2008-03-28 02:12:14 UTC
See http://www.packagekit.org/pk-help.html for the feature plan -- what you are describing will be worked on during 0.2.1 and 0.2.2. Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping A temporary workaround for me has been to "yum erase gnome-packagekit", "yum install gnome-python2-gconf", and download and install the pirut RPM from the Fedora 8 repository. It seems to break nothing. See http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2008/05/22/gpk-application-multiple-package-selection/ - what do you guys think of that? I don't know how to describe this well but that looks a bit odd. I was hoping we would come up something more interesting than check boxes again but this is a much needed functionality and I would suggest pushing an update to rawhide and updates-testing repository for Fedora 9 asap. When selecting multiple apps, users just need a brief descriptions and the group information. Everything else can be foldable. You can either provide that description when hovering over a package or better yet a foldable tree view might work well. I think a third pane for this is what I don't really like since it makes it somehow look like a triple pane file manager from Mac OS X instead of a simple package manager. Right, 0.2.3 should hit F9 in a few days/weeks time. |